Peer review ensures quality in academic research by having experts evaluate and validate study results before publication, crucial for maintaining scholarly integrity.

A survey of 1,600 academics found that more than 50% have used artificial intelligence tools while peer reviewing manuscripts ...

Half of Science Reviewers Use Artificial Intelligence. Three-Quarters Of Researchers Don’t Know When Publishers Do In A ...

Reviewer 1: “This manuscript is a timely and important contribution to the field, with clear methodology and compelling results. I recommend publication with only minor revisions.” Reviewer 2: “This ...

We are having difficulty finding a second reviewer for your manuscript.” This is a response we have received more than once ...

Some requests by reviewers to cite their own publications are coercive and can unnecessarily delay indexation and publication.

Peer reviews cost firms time and effort, and some accountants believe the process is focused on finding mistakes, but the purpose of peer reviews is to enhance engagement quality. Peer reviews can ...

A new whitepaper from Frontiers shows that AI has rapidly become part of everyday peer review, with 53% of reviewers now ...

Peer review contains inherent problems, and the way hospitals typically conduct the process only makes the situation worse. Not only is peer review often unfair to a doctor under evaluation, but it's ...